Comments on: More Paper

By: inesm2011

inesm2011 — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:37:46 +0000

I think this article is not exactly professional, but then again it is a review with allows it to lean towards the blog style of writing. It explains the plot , yet it focuses too much on one single person, Amanda. The other articles were also unprofessional, but at least this one was well written (excellent writing actually =P)

By: joselynm2009

joselynm2009 — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:14:25 +0000

It was a bit too conversational/unprofessional. The sentence structure threw me off, and confused me as to what the actual meaning of the sentences were. Its entertaining and witty but its not like most of the reviews we have seen. Its more to the point.

By: stephaniea2009

stephaniea2009 — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:14:09 +0000

First of all, the review for the paper is very brief and isnt as long as most reviews we have read.
It gives the general plot of the show and mentions characters but other than that there isnt much detail.

By: joselyng2010

joselyng2010 — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:14:03 +0000

I like the review a lot. It was short and to the point! It differs from other reviews because the format is different. There are Questions the editor out and under it are the responses. However, other reviews give a longer more descriptive view. It seems as if it were written for younger people rather than adults.

By: oscart2007

oscart2007 — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:13:40 +0000

The article had a more laid back feel to it. This was probably writen by a younger writer. I didnt like it because it was too inmature in my opinion.

By: wendyg2011

wendyg2011 — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:13:35 +0000

this review differs from the other ones we have read by this review comparing the “unscripted” tv series to other tv shows. Also, this article was much more conversational with the reader and not so new-sy as the other two. Unlike the article written by a student who talked about her own experience, this one gave it’s opinion on the show that it is, in reality, a good show.
Of course, it wasn’t a professional article but it was still pretty good. seriously. no joke. it was interesting to read.

By: blancaj2011j

blancaj2011j — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:13:12 +0000

This review is short and shows in simple terms what “The Paper” is about. Unlike the other articles, this article actually said that “The Paper” is a mixture of “The Office” and “The Hills” and “The Front Page”. It gives a section (two tiny paragraph at the beginning and end) where the opinion of the author is showed, but after that sticks to facts and observations made by the author. It’s certainly not the MTV article promoting their own show and not the article made by the Sun Sentinel where the student didn’t seem to watch the show.

By: stephanieo2011

stephanieo2011 — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:12:48 +0000

The article was really straight forward making it clear that they were going to review in a positive light by listing the shows good points. It was easy to read and understand but nothing amazing.

By: nataliea2011

nataliea2011 — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:11:52 +0000

i love this one! it had an irony in it that really caught the reader..it described amanda which was pretty good but i think it also could of described the others. but unlike the others this was actually describtive and wasnt too opinionated like the other or just wasnt raw facts like the others =)

By: amandae2011

amandae2011 — Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:10:30 +0000

i meant like, more (extensive) vocabulary than the other articles. but its still pretty average.